Coming from a more conservative background I was cautious
when I first began reading Lies. Having
heard some conservative criticism of the book, I was prepared to read some
radical revisionist propaganda! After reading chapter one, I realize that the
points that Loewen brings up are research based facts that are for one reason
or another have not been emphasized in traditional American history.
Chapter
One deals with the stories of Christopher Columbus, Thanksgiving and Woodrow
Wilson. Traditionally, American’s think of Columbus as a great navigator who
discovered the new world. This viewpoint is not wholly inaccurate but is
certainly incomplete. Columbus, along with the soldiers under his command, was
undeniably responsible for the annihilation of thousands of native Caribbean
tribes. Choosing to view him only as a sailor is a way of marginalizing the
perspective of Native American’s. Loewen goes on to show that Thanksgiving is
presented in a similar manner, with the perspectives of natives either left out
altogether or watered down to show a symbiotic relationship with Europeans.
Although
Loewen presented them in a unique way, the arguments over Columbus and
Thanksgiving are fairly mainstream. The argument over President Wilson’s racist
legacy was something new to me. I was surprised to hear that Wilson, who I
understood had fought for the right of self-determination for all nations,
actually only intended that right to be for Europeans. Segregating the Postal
Service was perhaps the most overt, and least discussed, action that Wilson
took to further a racist agenda.
I appreciated how thoroughly
researched Loewen’s arguments were, backing his theories with facts from
primary and secondary sources. I especially enjoyed his analysis of
contemporary historians, like Morrison, who readily admitted that he was
overlooking Columbus’ crimes against the natives. I enjoyed the first chapter and once I have an opportunity to
read more I intend to, but at the moment I have to finish the Grapes of Wrath!
Many of the criticisms of Loewen are actually pretty accurate. I think the book suffers a little in how blatantly Marxist it is. However, I love the fact that he offers an alternative narrative that is unblinkingly critical. I think we need more of that to stir up some of the conflict in social studies.
ReplyDelete